GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB THROUGH SECRETARY HOUSING AND PHYSICAL PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING LAHO versus MUHAMMAD ISMAIL KHAN BHATTI
As the applicant for the respondent's residential residential plot, entitled to a later change in the policy not to issue an allotment allotment against the allotted quota of section 4, he was found eligible for the allotment and thus the total cost of the plot. 20% of was submitted but the authorities refused the issuance of allotment letter under the exercise of constitutional jurisdiction, instructing the authorities to issue the allotment letter. Later change in the policy of the allotment of the plot in favor of the High Court. The entitled cannot take away the right, while relying on the preceding order. Supreme Court approves, directs authorities to allocate plot to journalist out of quota allocated for journalists, respondents apply for plot allotment before amending the policy as it is already entitled to it. The respondent has been eligible for allotment of the plot after completing the formal proceedings when such authorities cannot be returned to their relief in a decision adopted by the High Court on excuse for policy change. Failure to identify any kind of illegal interference or misrepresentation, whereby the Supreme Court The intervention was granted bail
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
