Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASHRAF versus STATE

Articles 302, 379, 100 and 34 Definition of Evidence Two versions of the case by the scope of self-defense and the charge against the accused / appellant was that he, together with the co-accused (since deceased), along with 12 bore carbines. In his statement under section 2342, the CCP, in his statement, pleaded his defense. It was the deceased and his accomplices who attacked and fired the accused and his accomplices, after which the defendants exercised their right to self-defense, and the accused and co-accused along with the appellant / accused were tried by the trial court. Sentenced and sentenced to death. According to the property FIR, the presence of eyewitnesses on the spot was coincidental and since there was a backdrop of enmity between the parties, the witnesses' statements required deep scrutiny and independent cooperation, both witnesses said. Contradicted each other and their statements did not support the salient features of the case. The circumstances revealed that the FIR immediately filed could not be recorded on time, but it was clear from the investigating officer. There was a deduction that wanted to show that the FIR was immediately available so that it could exist. The witnesses, who lived quite a distance, should not be doubted, as the circumstances of this case revealed that the witnesses were not present on the spot, that the recovery of weapons against the accused was not to be used as corroborative evidence. Neither was recovered from the vacancy nor was the weapon sent to the forensic science laboratory, so it was not possible to say that the weapon was used. In this event or to do this work famous lower court advocate from Mangi lawyer