Find a Lawyer

UBAID-UR-REHMAN versus SALAMAT ALI SHAH

A XXXVII, Rr 2, 3 and O XLVII, R 1 directive was issued against the order of the suit leave for the receipt of the promissory note and the application for a defense claim under which the defendant The revision request filed by the defendant was defended conditionally on instructing defendant to submit security, but he failed to comply with the order, requesting leave to appear and defense on his request. Was dismissed and the defendant was ordered to be upset by the defendant, who filed the review petition, even though the applicant was valid The matter relating to the case was dismissed, his order was ordered to be dismissed and his defense to dismiss the case, and in his absence his claim was dismissed because the evidence as per the record evidence An improper order was passed in the presence of a lawyer for the plaintiff. It was wrong to refer to the High Court in review and the invalid order based on the record misrepresentation was correct ect and the law did not challenge the defendant's decision and the decree was not challenged by the defendant by any appeal and only a review request was filed. While the review request was not diligently followed and was dismissed for illegal prosecution, the review parameters set forth in O. XLVII were not excluded. Guaranteed no interference in this case and so on Pakistan, top advocate family court from Kot Radha Kishan lawyer