MUHAMMAD HAMEED versus DISTRICT OFFICER (REVENUE), LAHORE
Sections 17 and 60 of the Punjab Registration Rules, 1929, R137 of the Punjab Finance Act (V of 1989), Section 7 [as amended by Section 15 of the Punjab Finance Act (III of 2006)] Exchange of Property (IV of 1882) , Article 54 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Application Levy of Capital Value Tax Document, Non-issuance of Certificate of Registration of Ownership of Documents The Stop Petitioner purchased the property and the local commissioner completed the sale process. Later, it was presented to the sub registrar on 23 on. 2006, the Sub Registrar for Registration refused to accept this document on the basis that it was not endorsed with any documentary evidence of the seller's ownership, therefore, in view of the Punjab Registration Rules 1929 KR 137 , The deferred registration error, which would then be enforced on the Capital Value Tax Applicant Registration Registration Act, 1908, did not authorize the sub-registrar to own the property. Investigate who M. Before the sale transaction was to be reviewed or confirmed to be proprietary, the seller should also have been asked to confirm the transaction either directly or through a local commissioner cell transaction. If he was brought in black and the white was complete when it was confirmed by the parties when the seller in the presence of witnesses put his signature and thumb impression on the document and the local commissioner appointed by the sub-registrar sealer Also accepted the receipt, accepted the title or purchase by the applicants. Since the buyer was complete the Finance Act, 1989
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
