Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ISMAIL versus GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHISTAN, THROUGH SECRETARY S&GA AND OTHERS

R7 Balochistan Civil Servants Act (IX of 1974), Section 9 Government Balochistan Rules of Business, R 39 (1) Balochistan Service Tribunals Act (V 1974), Section 4 Police Roll, 1934, Probability of progress in return Respondents, despite being junior, increasingly recognized the Deputy Superintendent of Police (BPS 17) as the Superintendent of Police (BPS 18), in recognition of their hard work, exceptional professionalism and their services. Promoted An appeal was filed against the senior respondents and it was stated that there is no provision under the Police Rules, 1934 or other service rules, under which officers working at BPS 17 Development progress may be allowed. In the police department; under the service rules, the development of officers can only be done by the departmental committee on the basis of low fitness of the security and that due to any strict reason the rapid development of the respondents for the gross misconduct of the appellants. , Was not given legal status under 1934, in the case of extraordinary service by a police officer, it could only be awarded in the form of medals, etc., and not without removing it from the turning publicity authority. There was discretion in using such options, but such discretion would not be a reasonable and logical service. Should be given. By chief executive, the tribunal ruled that powers to avoid such situations in the future, especially B-17s and above, had not given any rapid development without following the rules. Should have been rewarded for a police officer. Its excellent services best law firm from Kurram Agency lawyer