Find a Lawyer

MUSHTAQ AHMED AND ANOTHER versus STATE

Section 10 (3) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 377 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 203F (3) Re-review of the evidence on both the medical and ocular accounts of the trial court's jurisdiction on both the accused and six others. He was charged with kidnapping. The juvenile girl, who is about 11/12 years old and her minor brother is 12/13, was also charged with adultery and the crime was proved against both victims. The two accused were convicted and sentenced to twelve years in prison. , While the remaining six co-accused were acquitted and acquitted by the trial court, which was upheld by the Federal Shariat Court, the two accused raised by them on the sole statements of the victims. Found guilty, the statement of the doctor confirmed the statement of the legally injured woman who said in a twisted word that Heiman was missing and that she was pregnant. Such statement was also confirmed by an ultrasound report. According to she was pregnant. During 18 weeks the trial court justified the denial of the defense version and the same was upheld by the Federal Shariat Court. Any discerning person would have to deal with his married daughter's career as well as her younger age due to minor disputes. Even marriage will not be at stake. The following two courts, after proper appreciation of the evidence, convicted both the courts for the relevant reasons, keeping the principles of safe administration of the Supreme Court of the Supreme Court, weighing and considering the opinions of the courts. Below and in particular the opinion of the trial court, in which the parties, the witnesses law websites from Bhimbar lawyer