PROVINCE OF PUNJAB THROUGH DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PAKAPTTAN SHARIF versus VARIAM
Section 24 of the Special Relief Act (of 1877), for a 42-year-old plaintiff who had been sued under a 15-year suit, was taking advantage of the long-contentious land without paying anything to the government when the lease expired. The plaintiff prayed for the proprietary rights. Subsequently, the collector instructed the plaintiff to pay the sale price with a fine of Rs 2000, with notice under section 24 of the Government Land Colonization (Punjab) Act, 1912, which was challenged by a statement. Which was dismissed by the appellate court. The terms and conditions of the allotment by the plaintiff were imitative. The Court of Appeal did not mention which violations could be justified under the law, and the plaintiff who admits that he was negligent in this case and failed to pay the cost of the property and the penalty was still in dispute. I was resumed by a land-rights collector so the appellate court should not have interfered with the collector-approved order of law
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
