Find a Lawyer

DESSER MAL versus STATE

Section 9 (c) accused of defining evidence was arrested by Rangers on the basis of enmity with a Ranger inspector, whom the accused had vacated due to house malfunction. The inspector said the fact had raised doubts about the reality of the incident. The story of the accused, who was allegedly recovered during the raid, was not sealed in a basket, but he was standing at a table, with the prosecutor claiming that two separate samples weighing 500 grams were each of the Chemical Examiner. Was sent to, but the Chemical Examiner's report revealed that its weight was that the two samples were 355 grams and 360 grams respectively, after a delay of five days the drug samples were sent to the Chemical Examiner, I was not late explained by the prosecution at that time it was claimed by the prosecution that the prosecution was not proven Yes, it is. The allegation goes beyond reasonable doubt; the conviction and sentence against the accused were dropped by the trial court. \ R \ n \ r \ n advocate from Sohawa District Daska lawyer