Find a Lawyer

NAZIM versus STATE

Sections 497 and 161 of the Crimes for Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979); Feedback. Neither binding nor binding on evidence in court. The implication of the accusation against the accused / applicant was that he committed adultery with a 15/16-year-old girl who had been silent for only a few months to save her honor. And after getting pregnant, the matter was reported to her parents and others, the trial court dismissed the post-bail bail filed by the accused accused, which delayed the filing of the FIR by 8/9 months. Except for the alleged victim's statement, no other evidence was found against the accused and that during the interrogation, the accused was found to be inadmissible in filing an FIR in adultery cases, because in general Angry parties refrain from making such reports. In order to protect the police's respect, the allegations made in the FIR were fully corroborated by the statements made by the victims under Section 161, CRPC, which could not be easily set aside by the criminal. Cases were always settled on the basis of evidence and not on the basis of arbitrators' decisions. The police opinion was neither admissible in the evidence nor bound to the courts. In the case of DNA test, in the case of a DNA test, in the case of a DNA test, in the case of a DNA test, the accused would not be entitled to be released from bail, in the case of a DNA test. The accused also took her out of favor of bail power of attorney advocate Bolan lawyer