Find a Lawyer

ZAHOOR AHMED versus MEMBER, (CONSOLIDATION) BOARD OF REVENUE, PUNJAB

Article 199 High Court (Lahore) Rules and Orders, Volume V, Chap 4F, R10 (i), Part III of the Part J Constitutional Request Joint Application Scope Office Objecting to a Joint Request by Multiple Applicants in Court Fees More than 300 applicants were upset over some order passed by the Board of Revenue. There is also a common law question and a reason for action, so, all applicants filed a joint request that it was considered to each applicant, rather than setting a court fee, to settle court fees separately. Validation for each applicant, in a joint petition, had its own cause of action - the relief claim by such applicant was to its extent and each applicant's complaint was shared by each applicant in the joint application. Will be an individual request. Is considered to be independent and each of these persons was required to pay court fees separately. The purpose of allowing joint petitions was to avoid decisive decisions or to simply not allow anyone to litigate. d Properly file an application without the hassle of filing and filing applications separately, as this alone cannot exclude applicants from paying court fees. One set of court fees was not legal, one set of court fees was payable by multiple individuals. Associations, etc. law firms from Kumbh lawyer