Find a Lawyer

RANJHA versus STATE

Section 302 (b) / 34 Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 7 (a) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Re-examination of evidence Multiple murder convictions concurrently charged with the crime The court also found allegations of guilt finding by the courts. Four people were charged with murder along with two accomplices. After the trial was completed, the trial court, the accused, was sentenced to death, fined and his accomplices were acquitted. The sentence was pronounced by the trial court which was heard by the High Court in the court. The indictment was that his case was similar to that of his co-accused and could not be executed. The alternative to the prosecution was a rare case, and except for the complainant, who allegedly murdered the brother of the accused, there was no previous history of hostility to the other prosecutor's witnesses. To say that they intended to make false accusations against the accused, misconduct or misconduct against them, in the light of day, the identity of the accused was free from any doubt, with the help of medical evidence, the presence of independent witnesses. Attendance status also identifies minor contradictions and contradictions affecting facts and confidence, including the recovery of vacancies, the post-mortem reports of the two victims and the prompt filing of an FIR without compromise and exaggeration. The statements made by the witnesses were of no significance; the direct evidence presented by natural and independent witnesses proved the charge against the accused beyond any reasonable doubt; the trial of the two courts relating to the accused's guilt. I have no legal and factual weakness law firms from Warburton lawyer