Find a Lawyer

SHAHEEN AIRPORT SERVICES versus MUHAMMAD YASIN

Sections 46, 47 (3) and 48 of the West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VII 1968), request for removal of the section O15 service, were sent to the appellant seeking termination of employment. They complained and after giving notice to the employer, they filed a complaint, which was accepted by the Labor Court against which the employer had appealed that the employer requested that the worker not have good behavior. Nor does he have a good service record and was involved in the theft. 16 expensive leather jackets against which they were prosecuted, but for technical reasons and their influence, it was stated that the action was abandoned for the theft of 16 jackets attributed to 16 workers. The incident, which occurred in 1994 and no action was taken, dismissed the worker's dismissal with malicious intent, which could not be verified in any case, or a decision by the Labor Court to keep it. The decision was based on valid and valid reasons and no intervention was required. Or that no appeal was made against this decision, it was rejected tax advocates from Gujranwala lawyer