Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RIAZ versus STATE

Definitions of Articles 302, 109 and 34 Evidence Defective Failure to File FIRs Statements of witnesses did not prove contradictions of material The effect was not a particular piece of evidence, the defendant / appellant's scope of charge was that Committed murder along with his accomplices. The complainant's sister with a 30-bore pistol shot in her son's stomach. The co-accused also opened fire, which did not kill the deceased, eye witnesses alleged that the suspect was identified in an electric bulblight. The previous rivalry with the acquitted accused was the trigger of the incident which was sentenced by the trial court and sentenced the accused to death. Witnesses contradicted each other on material points; the matter was reported to the police late. The incident took place in the dark as there was no light source and the prosecution failed to prove any motive against the accused. One of the eyewitnesses tried to hide his relationship with the complainant, but then he recognized a close relationship with her (which had already begun to diminish) the trial. They were witnesses because they said they had gone to the complainant's doorstep with gossip. The matter was told to the police about 3/2 hours late, while the police station was only five minutes away. And witnesses were suspected of being present, the two witnesses repeated each other on almost all material points and their statements FIRFR According to the story that were not given, an accused in the murder case of the accused have been charged and criminal advocate from Sudhnoti lawyer