Find a Lawyer

KHALID HUSSAIN versus NAVEED ALIAS QALB ALI

Section 417 (2A) of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), Section 13 (e) challenged the defendant's / the defendant's felony charge of possessing a non-licensed pistol against the retention of probate, the Judicial Magistrate said. The defendant / accused was acquitted on the basis. The prosecution failed to present their testimony against them when an unlicensed TT pistol was recovered from the possession of the respondents / accused while investigating the case related to the murder of appellant's brother and section 13 (e) of the West. A case has been registered against the accused for the offense. Respondents of the Pakistan Arms Ordinance, 1965, were already in police custody in connection with the murder. Appellant, being the brother of the deceased, will be a "grieving person" who has filed an appeal against the murder of his brother accused of killing his brother. But it was not a case of his felony charge of murder, the respondents were acquitted only of C on charges of possessing unlicensed pistol and he also failed to present witnesses testimony on the basis of litigation. And the question about the expression of any opinion on which the magistrate had not recorded any evidence by denying the evidence The picking lawyer will not argue that the respondents should be acquitted. The charge of possessing an unlicensed pistol harmed his brother's murder case, which was completely baseless because no opinion was given by the magistrate about the quality of the evidence even if the magistrate had examined the evidence. Respondents acquitted, but their opinion on the quality of evidence, the trial court will not be obligated to try the murder case registration advocate from Lakki Marwat lawyer