Find a Lawyer

AHMAD SHER versus STATE

Sections 302, 315 and 316 were charged with defining evidence that he killed the deceased (complainant's wife) with a brick injury while the latter was watering his buffalo in a water course. It was alleged that the deceased received a fatal injury when he, collecting the dung of the horse, approached the horse's back legs on which the animal kicked the deceased from its back leg, the trial court found the accused in Section 302, He was sentenced under PPC and sentenced to life imprisonment, who served in the post. The deceased was discharged that in the event of injury to the kick of the horse, as claimed by the accused, a precise signal, the horse's foot on the injury spread but confessed. Not that there was no trace of the horse's foot at the site of the injured prosecution, it was proved that the accused's death was due to a brick lid that resulted in hot words. The defendant and the defendant, in part, subsequently attracted Section 315, PPC, due to brick injury to the temporal bone and if the facts of a case attracted a specific part of the partial procedure, As the current case has sections 151515 and 6 316, the PPC is fully attracted. , Then the sentence could not be recorded under any part of section 302, the PPC break-beat was not usually a weapon of crime but in the present case it proved fatal and the deceased lost his life, therefore, the section 316, was to be registered under PPC and not under section 2302, PPC conviction was recorded by the trial court under section 2302, PPC was against the law. jobs for fresh advocates from Bisham lawyer