Find a Lawyer

MAQBOOL AHMAD versus STATE

Sections 497 (2) and 22 A Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 396 and 302 bail, further investigation grants were made overnight but the identification was not paraded, the vehicle was not recovered from the special possession. The IR has reported that 7/8 people with firearms came to his house in a car and looted various articles, including rifles, cash and gold jewelry, the resistant criminals complained to the complainant and his son and One was injured. The accused opened fire on the rifle and killed his second son. The complainant filed a petition under Section 22A, CRPC, in which he stated that the real culprit of the crime was a different person, pleading in the case. The defendant / accused was arrested and after his arrest his bail was dropped from the trial. The trial court was not listed in the FIR and was involved in the case on the statement of the co-accused, which had no result. The incident took place at night and there was no identity of him. Act parade was held to determine the identity and responsibility of the accused in the case. In addition, further investigations will also be required, according to the prosecutor's version, alleged that he was only driving at the time of the incident which was used to transport him. Likewise, the question of the distribution of implied liability by him also required further investigation by the complainant in his application under Section 22A, which the CCP claimed he had committed three offenses during the incident. Was identified (applicant was not included) but police did not arrest the actual accused immigration advocates phone number from Skardu lawyer