Find a Lawyer

MITHA KHAN versus STATE

Articles 9 (c), 25 and 48 define testimony, reduction of sentence, contradiction of any material FIR, either in the version of the prosecution such as the statement made by the FIR or the prosecution witnesses, The statements of the prosecutor were re-presented, saying that the prosecution's witnesses were examined, but nothing was retracted from their statements that it was alleged that the violation of Section 103, CR PC While recovering effect was obtained, any force was excluded because the provisions of Section 25 of the Control of Drug Substances Act 1997, which was a special law, were exclusive. In dismissing the section 103 petition, the PC police officers were as competent witnesses as private witnesses and their testimony could not be excluded simply because they were police personnel and in relation to the quantity of recorded drug substance. An analysis of the evidence of recovery and the sending of it to the chemical, established by the chemical analyst's witnesses, was positively charged in connection with the substance, but failed to present a case to be successful in the circumstances. , Was the first offender and had no previous record on which the accused was convicted by trial. God, he was sentenced to ten years imprisonment. Imprisonment while payment of fines was maintained \ r \ n immigration advocates contact from Rajana lawyer