Find a Lawyer

SHERZADA versus MIR MUHAMMAD

Sections 8, 42 and 54 of the Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), section 115 suits which are the possession, declaration and permanent injunction against the defendant who claim to be the owner of the land they inherited from the original owner. ? Defendants presented five witnesses in support of their claim, but the evidence presented by them was insufficient and insufficient to conclude that they were actually successors in the interest of the original. Both courts of the suit property rejected the plaintiffs 'version for valid and reasonable reasons, which were not open to legitimate exclusion. In the plaintiffs' cases, the courts could not identify any misunderstanding or misunderstanding by the courts. Falsifies orders, reads inaccurate false news and has not read evidence, with no positive endeavor, without any conclusions, results of discovery of fact recorded by the two courts below, Section 115, C.P. The exercise of its amending jurisdiction under the C may not be disturbed by the High Court, unless The two courts below record the finding of facts, either misinterpreting the evidence or ignoring any material fragment. The evidence found on record by the following two courts was against the evidence in the record. This is solely based on a mistake in the law or a procedural error, which may affect the decision on the merits of the case. \ R \ n \ r \ n law websites from Chak Jamal lawyer