Find a Lawyer

JAMIL AKHTAR SIDDIQUI versus STATE BANK OF PAKISTAN

Article 199 Constitutional application Voluntary Golden Hand Shake Scheme along with hundreds of other employees were selected to retire under the Voluntary Golden Hand Shake Scheme issued by employees / bank. Applicant's authority was accepted by the bank and while the employees who were employed were still in service under the voluntary Golden Handshake scheme, the bank issued a circular under which employees' salaries were structured. Increased, which was effective 15 days from today, applicants who have opted for retirement under the scheme have been paid. The revised rate is retained until his retirement, but his retirement bank calculates his acquisition under the Salary Based Scheme, which was applied at the time of the exercise of powers under the Scheme and not on the final payroll basis. ? Bank practices have been rejected. He filed an appeal before the Federal Service Tribunal, which was also dismissed, after which Petitioners filed an appeal in the Supreme Court stating that all expenses, including pensions, as well as other retirements. Calculations will be made on the basis of last salary including allowance. Under the aforesaid scheme, the case was brought only to the Supreme Court based on the last paid salary of the employees, but refused to take advantage of the other employees in such a way that they could raise the matter in a court of law. Did not Banks apply the same scheme differently to a group of employees attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Parachinar lawyer