Find a Lawyer

RIZWAN AHMED versus STATE

Sections 302, 392, 411 and 34 evidence of the value of the doubt was not the case of an eyewitness because no one had seen anyone while the accused had allegedly committed the murder of the deceased jeweler by robbery. Was not recovered from a moving car or immediately. When he was detained. Although it was a mystery how his house was recovered, the recovery of the jewelry mentioned on the suspect's identity was of no importance. Under the circumstances, no weapons of crime were recovered on his indictment after the arrest of any accused. ? Not free from any doubt, the benefit of the doubt was extended to the accused, the trial court's decision was set aside, the accused was acquitted of all charges and released. advocate from Qalandarabad lawyer