Find a Lawyer

FAIZ ELAHI versus STATE

Section 409 defined the evidence, convicted, reduced the broad features of the allegations made by the complainant, was confirmed by other witnesses presented by its prosecution during the trial, prepared two supporting notes which But the accused punished the complainant and executed him. He said that the supportive notes would not have been presented by the accused for any reasonable reason. If there was no case of misuse, there would be no opportunity for the accused to be called in favor of the complainant as the accused and the complainant. There were no business terms between. He said that the defendant's version of the defendant's note in the prosecution's case was found to be degraded at all because he did not appeal the reasoning and he was realistic and thought-provoking to defend himself. Instead of the fact that the accused had tried to assassinate the role of the ant / banker, section 409, the PPC was completely attracted to the facts of the case. It was alleged that no offense was found under Section 409, PPC, he was guilty of prosecution, in the circumstances he was able to prove his case against the accused. However, beyond any doubt, the accused and the complainant had an opportunity to recover the wrong amount from the accused on the basis of the pro-execution notes in favor of the complainant. And there is a civil suit pending, the defendant was sentenced because he was sentenced to seven years imprisonment / the RI given to the accused by the trial court was reduced to four years, Whose f famous lower court advocate from Mohen Jo Daro lawyer