Find a Lawyer

SECRETARY, EDUCATION (SCHOOLS), GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB, LAHORE versus MUHAMMAD AKHTAR, EX HEADMASTER

RR 2 (1), 3 and 4 Pension Rules, 1969, R1 8 Powers Rules Rules, 1990, R 3 (a) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 1212 (3) Headmaster misappropriation of funds. Recovery, the Charge Service Tribunal did not allege misconduct or misconduct against a civil servant in the Headmaster's Accreditation Charge Sheet, but alleges that the amount of money spent on the purchase of goods without formal observation of the coddle was unauthorized. The chargeback was a felony charge and the allegation should be of a special nature, in which a proper explanation could be given to the designated officer, proper approval was given for illegal purchases, the headmaster And the Director of Education was instructed to pay contractors received approval to issue the cancellation letter, bill payment was received from various goods. Already purchased goods were physically available and were mentioned in the relevant purchase as per Headmaster 1, 1986, under the Circular Letter No. FD (FR II) 5/82 of the Treasury Department, 3 , Was able to bear the costs up to 00,000 R, without explaining the nature of the allegations and following the prescribed procedure, a joint inquiry was conducted against a dozen headmasters, resulting in a serious miscarriage of justice. That he had initiated disciplinary proceedings against the Headmaster a year after his retirement. immigration advocates from Nawab Shah lawyer