Find a Lawyer

KHAMISO KHAN versus SECRETARY, DISCIPLINARY ACTION COMMITTEE

Section 2 (XXX), 46 and 48 West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI of 1968), Section 2 (i) The status of the employees who maintain the grievance application, to be initially appointed as Assistant The High Court of Appeals for the appellant was determined at the bank, consequently promoted as a Grade III officer. The appellant claimed that despite his development, he was serving as a clerk and was a "laborer" within the meaning of section 2 (i) of the West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders). Ordinance, 1968; and his plea filed before the Labor Court was worth hearing and he was entitled to the relief sought for the Labor Court and his complaint was dismissed in the capacity of a Grade III officer. Which was also the Bank of Attorney. Appointed as a lawyer, with various powers of supervision and as an officer of the bank, Appellant Bank was entitled to perform various administrative and administrative duties on behalf of the appellant, in which case the grade III officer appellant's salary. He was drawing, that despite his powers of execution, he was doing scholarly work in his favor, but he could not prove that he was hiring a scholar, claiming that he was of this period. This was the nature of the work they did during The burden of proof was on the appellant that he was performing duties as a "craftsman" or caretaker, but he could not be released. This burden does not determine the nature of an employee's duties, whether comfortable or sub-job in a particular position. ask a advocate free from Kotmomin lawyer