Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD TARIQ versus SECRETARY GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB

R4 (2), Proviso II Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Maintenance was senior according to the Final Sanitary List acting as Assistant in the Pro Pharma Promotion Intelligence Petitioner Department and the Administrator of the Department for Pro Pharma Promotion Was recommended by. But he was not promoted and instead promoted to his juniors, one of the assistants, who was a junior, because his problem was difficult because he was promoted to three younger people. Not only the applicant's case fell on that basis, but due to better action because the applicant was the most senior assistant petitioner also deserved a relaxation which the junior assistant while deciding on such matters. Validity was given to public officers, which needed to be dealt with in other similar matters. Instead of showing favoritism to one person and neglecting other applicants, the same premise should have been considered at that stage and he should have received a pharma promotion with an assistant who, despite being a junior, was equally convincing of the department. That the constitutional request from the applicant was not intact as the matter should have been aggravated by the applicants before the service tribunal. Contrary to R4 (2), the Providence II of the Civil Servant (Appeal) Rules 1977 did not lie, as in fitness-related matters or otherwise, the constitutional petition was enforceable, in which case the constitutional petition By accepting, a defamation order was set up by the High Court with the department's directive to promote the pharma \ r \ n \ r \ n list of advocates from Chilas lawyer