Find a Lawyer

DR. MUHAMMAD RAMZAN AZAM versus ARIF ALI

Sections 497 (5) and 498 of the Conduct Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 489F guarantee, do not cancel any role which is alleged to be the accused involved in the entire FIR case. Was dismissed and the dismissal bail was dismissed by the applicant / complainant to the extent of the co-accused, the evidence of the prosecution revolved around the accused, who was the main culprit in the case, the accused went to the applicant / complainant. And told him that he introduced another co-accused as the original owner and asked him to buy the plot. The underwriting plot was the person who issued the check to the complainant, but when the complainant went for a check inquiry, he was told by the bank that the accused's account was closed, the accused's bail was granted before the arrest, Earlier, the consideration of bail approval was quite different from arrest after arrest, the trial court granted bail on charges and estimates, there was no case for approval of bail before arrest, to the extent that bail was granted. The request for cancellation was granted and accordingly the bail order was withdrawn registration advocate from Mian Chunnu lawyer