Find a Lawyer

HUSNAIN MOHYUDDIN versus STATE

Section 157 (2) and 516 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Applicants for Detention applicant alleges that his car was stolen by an unknown person, police seized the vehicle and under section 157 (2) The petitioners and the respondents, both of whom filed separate petitions to submit their petition to the Ali Meteor Magistrate, who rejected both petitions, both sides filed their separate criminal review, Additional Sessions Judge In front of where the defendant succeeded and the vehicle was ordered to be taken into custody. The question came from a relative of the respondent, who obtained the route permit from the transport authority and also had the original registration book in his name which was transferred by the Excise and Taxation Office in his name from the relevant applicant's claim. That he was the owner of the vehicle, whose documents were stolen and then the vehicle itself removed by the respondent unauthorized / without its approval, after recording the evidence and conducting a full trial. Requires a commitment that was not valid in a constitutional petition, where the parties' position on their ownership claim is located. For which the defendant has already filed the case, the Additional Sessions Judge through the Civil Court took the matter of safe custody of the vehicle from the respondent which required him to issue a bail bond. An anonymous ruling has revealed that the dispute has been properly stopped without committing any fault of law / fact which has no case for interference with the constitutional jurisdiction. The High Court has even decided list of supreme court advocates from Karachi lawyer