ALLIED BANK OF PAKISTAN LIMITED versus MALIK REHMATULLAH
Section 25A & 37 (3) Service Complaint Request Limitation Appeal for complaint against dismissal service order was filed by the employee two and a half years after the order of his dismissal, and thus the employees Was temporarily stopped. After filing a complaint, the Appeal was filed before the Service Tribunal, which was returned for submission to this competent forum, after which the employees filed an appeal in the Supreme Court, which was also dismissed. Even after a court employee dismisses his appeal, the employee remained silent for 23 days, not mentioning any grounds in the petition for condolences if he wasted time during litigation before excluding other forums. Goes, there was still an unspoken delay of 23 days but the employee was obliged to explain every day's delay but did not give any reason / reasonable cause. I told. The grievance request was being banned, only the score was obliged to exclude the unreasonable order of the Labor Court. ie the application filed by the employee was approved, set aside and the complaint application was dismissed. \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Malakand lawyer