SALES TAX APPEALS NOS. 328/LB, 330/LB TO 332/LB OF 2000, DECIDED ON 8TH AUGUST, 2006. versus SALES TAX APPEALS NOS. 328/LB, 330/LB TO 332/LB OF 2000, DECIDED ON 8TH AUGUST, 2006.
Sections 3, 2 (12), 2 (16), 2 (17) (E), 2 (33), 13 and Sixth Schedule Circle of Tax Exemption Gardners, Construction and Use of Bridges Found by First Appellate Authority That the production and self-use of girders under the ird headingird 91 production 0000 heading under the PCT was not subject to sales tax payment. The girders already inserted by the taxpayers on the site were not salable, could not be sold in the open market, or used in other bridges or buildings because they were built by the department or before. According to the design, specifications and drawings of the bridge in which it was to be used, it was said that it had not been moved to another location from where it was moved. Where the bridge was under construction that it fell under the definition of precast girder / manufacture of, under section 2 (12), sufficient grounds for taxing the girder for tax exemption. was not. Due to the inability of the Sales Tax Act, 1990 to build, use / transport and otherwise not use of precast guards for inaccessible, interchangeable or other use, they are ` Appeal for deprivation of legal power of the department was not enforceable, not liable for sales tax, and it was rejected by the appellate tribunal and the order was maintained in the appeal. \ R \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top civil advocates from Mirpur Mathelo lawyer
