Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AKRAM versus D.H.O. VEHARI

Arts 25, 199 and 212 Law Reform Ordinance (XII of 1972), Section 3 Infra-Court appeals to terminate service Constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court of Appeals, which, on the order of the District Health Officer, was appointed by the Recruiting Committee as dispensers and vaccinators. Selected and served on. The department for more than 13 years, but their services were terminated. The appellants in their constitutional petition challenged their dismissal before the High Court, alleging that the District Health Officer, who has terminated his services, has neither authority nor authorized officer. The High Court dismisses the constitutional application to pass the order, which states that this matter is related to the terms and conditions of service and is fully applicable to the matter contained in Article 1212 of the Constitution, which is the High Court (Single judge) did not praise the person who passed the termination order, no option to pass it Had been Order because he was a suspended person himself and could not be. Authorized Authorities who are approved by the District Health Officer, in which case the illegal decree was illegal and in such cases, the High Court had to It would be appropriate to exercise our constitutional jurisdiction to abolish such an injunction. Not only through the service tribunal, but also in this case by the Supreme Court regarding the constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court, when the services of the appellant's other colleagues were already regularized, at the same level Should be treated and treated as appeals law firms from Bhan Saeedabad lawyer