Section 497 the Conventional Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 324, 337F (ii), 504 and 34 guarantees, the grant of the present case was one, but it consisted of two proceedings, one in the State case and the other on the direct complaint. Stay on. In a direct complaint proceeding, when the trial court deemed it appropriate to issue a bail warrant and a non-bailable warrant was issued, the trial court issued a hot cold, at which time the accused was on bail in the direct complaint, Under which the commission of the crime was run. Section 242424, PPC was charged, while according to the same facts they were denied bail in the case of the state, where PPC was not charged under section 242424, because 242424, was not attracted to the PPC, was not a state lawyer. Able to reconcile both orders passed by the same court, one directly in the complaint and the other in the state case since the accused was on bail in the direct complaint which was to proceed, so in any case the accused's bail There was no justification for exclusion. E, who was to appear before the accused, was, in the circumstances, admitted on bail
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
