Find a Lawyer

ATTAULLLAH ALIAS QASIM versus STATE

Section 302 (b) Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 7 (i) (a) Validating evidence No material contradiction was identified by the lawyer by the prosecutor if the credibility of the prosecution's witness After suspecting that if it was subsequently deposed, in fact, it was brought to the record, it cannot be said that the identity of the accused in the identification parade became more important at that time due to an unethical improvement. Was when the three witnesses confidently identified the suspect who had killed the deceased. The prosecution's testimony was more clear evidence of the truth of the prosecution's witnesses, although it happened at midnight and the suspect's identity was not possible, but there was sufficient evidence that the bulb was outside the lane / street house. Helped all witnesses outside the home to identify the accused whom they saw on the day of the incident as the suspect, who could not be disputed because of the credibility of the prosecutor's witness's death. There was also enough evidence, as well as a report from the Medical Officer, that confirmed the death of the deceased due to firearms. Has been. Distance by eyewitnesses, which was an additional evidence or evidence of the presence of blackness around the victim's wounds, was not found to falsely imply previous hostility between the parties, witnesses testified before the prosecution. The role was assigned, the crime against the accused being convicted under section 2302 (b) under the circumstances was fully proved, the PPC was retained and the counter-terrorism was committed. Crimes punishable under Section 7 (a) of the Act 1997 best advocate from Khair Pur lawyer