COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE AND SALES TAX versus PAKISTAN FERTILIZER COMPANY LTD.
Article 23 Transfer of Property Act (I82 of I82), Section 7 Contract Act (IX IX 1872), Section 557 Civil Procedure Code (VV 1908), Section 151 Terms and conditions for changing the right to hold and transfer the inherent powers of the High Court The federal government terminated a dispute-leasing contract in 1982 for the establishment of the Fatalizer Plant Company, and defendants bought the land in 2003 as the highest bidder auction buyer, The sale was contracted with some other people, in response to a question about revenue part of the sale by the auction buyer. Refused to issue a "no objection certificate" for the execution of a leasehold sale agreement for a portion of the land, which is a violation of the provisions of the Intenture of Lease granted by the Federal Government High Court, The direction required by the auction buyer under section 151 on the petition filed by the auction buyer was that the certificate of objection raised by the authorities was that the High Court had no authority to amend the lease. The conditional title to the land under the title was given to the original leaseholder and no better honor could be given to it. At auction, the buyer's High Court had no authority to amend, delete, add or add to the auction buyer's favor in the lease sale certificate indenture, but could not violate or modify the terms and conditions of the lease indenture. By means of the relevant ministry, the dismissal of the company meant that without the necessary parties, namely, President Pakistan, by which the lease of industry was executed, the federal hierarchy.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Jalozai lawyer