Find a Lawyer

NAND LAL versus STATE

Section 27 (4) Definition of Evidence The benefit of doubt is that the best evidence clause, which was in question, was not presented to the trial court by trial if the best evidence available to the party was withheld. If so, the parties had some motive behind such proceedings that the witnesses were not afforded the opportunity to confirm whether the property presented to the court was the property obtained from the warehouse so that the prosecution prosecution. This can be legally indicated in the case where it can be contacted as soon as it is stopped, which will allow the prosecution's story to materialize. Will be negatively affected. It has been said that the property has not been sent to the state analyst to determine whether it is a 'drug' in the sense of the Drugs Act 1976. The prosecutor's case was badly affected. The prosecutor did not produce the property, on the basis of which the case was started. In order to show that the alleged Drug Act was the property drug in the meaning of 1976, without such evidence of the Drug Inspector on the subject, Ocular testimony cannot be safely relied upon, the defendant in the circumstances The drug court was insufficient to convict. He did not take note of the challan submitted by the police, but after obtaining the necessary permission from the competent authority prosecution, expressed serious concern over the direct complaint filed by the drug inspector, as he could, without any reasonable doubt, prosecute the accused. Had failed to prove, the benefit of the doubt, which was accordingly given to him \ r \ n ask a advocate free from Chicha watni lawyer