SHAFQAT ULLAH TUNIO versus PIA (PAKISTAN INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES)
Seventh Twelfth, R1 Service Tribunals (Code of Conduct), 1974, R 21 Applicant seeking leave against appeal decision for delay of 9 days, sent to applicant by registered post record dated 8 28 2002 9 was reported on 2002. The copy of the dastardly decision was issued on 7-9 2002, while the second copy was issued on 29 9 2002, which in fact will not extend beyond the limit despite timely written notice to the Advocate on record by the office. This indicates that the request is restricted to 9. The day, no effort was made to move the petition for 2/2 years, the Supreme Court dismissed the request for extension of time to explain the facts and grounds of the delay.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocates from Punch lawyer
