Find a Lawyer

FAROOQUE AHMED versus STATE

Section 497 (2) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 412 bail, the grant of further investigation charges against the accused was that he was found in the possession of the car and returned the car along with four other accomplices to the accused. The lawsuit was filed under Section 121212, PPC, was not only required to state that the accused occupied the robbery property, but also that he knew it or had reason to believe that under section property1212. Property was transferred through the commission of robbery, PPC was more serious than crime under Section 111111, PPC where there was no evidence to prove that the accused knew the property in possession. The robber, who could not be prosecuted under section 121212, was charged with PPC two FIs against the accused and was granted bail. The name of the accused was not mentioned in an FIR which stated that there are two FIRs and there is no material available on the record other than the recovery on the vehicle to show that the accused has the property he has. Knows or has some reason to believe it. In the absence of such material which was exchanged by the commission of the robbery, further investigation was prosecuted against the accused and it was decided in the case whether the alleged crime committed by the accused was made under section 121212, pp. C or Sections tions11 & & 4144 was punishable, no reasonable grounds were available for the PPC, in these circumstances to assume that the accused had committed a crime which was committed under the prohibited clause of section 497. Yes, the CCP suspect was admitted on bail famous high court advocate from Naudero lawyer