Find a Lawyer

RANJHA MASIH versus STATE

The testimony of section 295C was not defined at the time of the incident in the FIRFR, as well as the statements of eyewitnesses, even though it was alleged that the members of the procession were alleged. There were slogans against the Muslims, but as described the exact words spoken by members of the procession, and especially by the prosecution, although it has been alleged that in the relevant boards and plates, Durood Sharif and Ali Aring words are signs of violence on them, was never established by the prosecution which stated that the board And the plates are really damaged or that the accused and other members of the procession have not suffered such damage or because of any other factor that has been thrown on the boards and plates mentioned before being in question due to stones and shoes. Was never recovered during the interrogation. All four witnesses presented by the prosecution provided a common man common and joint charges against the accused and other members of the procession and never through their individual speech or No act of the accused was specified and no other member of the procession was named Nor was he identified, nor did anyone say a word before the trial. Any stone or shoe was thrown at the relevant time on the boards and plates. It has been fully proven that the accused was falsely implicated in the case by a political vendetta, alleging that he was last seen behind bars. Serious suspicion under section 295C Pakistan, top advocate family court from Kotli lawyer