Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ARIF versus STATE

Validating the provisions of Sections 302 (b) / 148 and 149 at the relevant time, the presence of the prosecution witnesses was fully proved that the accused was allegedly the brother of the accused and due to the close relationship between the two and their As well as long-standing enmity toward the complainant; his involvement in allegedly supporting the perpetrator, he also cannot be doubted. The dispute that resulted in a long-standing rivalry between the parties over alleged allegations was the result. Defense and enmity between the parties were not denied by the prosecution. The admitted fact was that the ocular evidence had the full backing of the medical evidence because of the length of the suspects mentioned on the body wounds that stated that the wounds were not covered by the wounds. There was no contradiction between any account and medical evidence related to the charges of non-submission of the case, but the accused could not be recovered, but the police recovered an 8mm rifle blank from the spot. The prosecution provided regular evidence to the extent that the defendant was a legal defendant of AID, medical evidence and crime. The witnesses' statements could not be excluded by the vacancy only on the basis that they were related to each other and were in disgust with the accused and intended to attack the other accomplices. The complaining party that resulted in the victim being killed was dismissed by the accused's appeal and the trial court ruled that the accused was tried and sentenced by an improper verdict, best advocate from Farooqabad lawyer