MUHAMMAD YASIN versus NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN THROUGH MANAGER
Sections 9, 10 and 22 apply for a grant of leave to serve the defendant's appellant and his mother for a debt recovery proceeding against the former party and the former party decree against the appellant was passed and the former There was a petition filed by the appellant to keep the party decree separate. The banking court appellant rejected, claiming that although the appellant's address was correctly given to the plaintiff, it was erroneously recorded in the banking court proceedings and that in the circumstances there was no proper law There was no service. The residential area block was designated as USMA, while in the process, it was referred to as UZMA. It cannot be said that, in cases where the appellant was formally employed, the appeal was allowed, the unexpected order and the ex parte decree were appointed by the High Court. Appellant may apply for approval of leave for defense under Section 10 of the Financial Institutions (Tax Recovery) Ordinance, 2001, within a specified period
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
