MUMTAZ ALI RAJPAR versus REGISTRAR HIGH COURT OF SINDH, KARACHI
Section 3B Civil Service's Offensive Remarks In the disciplinary proceedings charged with the termination of subordinate judicial services, the employee will not qualify for a clear slate unless the employee's ACR remarks are relevant to the employee. There was ample opportunity when dealing with representation, while there was no employee dispute regarding delays in ACR communications. With the reporting officer as well as the authority already occupied due to too much judicial work, the mere delay in committing the negative comments, in the AC, under the circumstances, would be no reasonable basis for excluding the same order which was approved. The air was appropriate and legally correct, requiring no interference
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous lower court advocate from Layyah lawyer
