Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASIF SAIGAL versus STATE

Section 497 Customs Act (IV of 1969), Sections 156 (1) (9), (10A), (11), (14) and 14 (A) guarantee, export goods grants, according to the prosecution, non-standard , Which was primarily assumed on the basis of announced pricing, nor did the testing officers' reports suggest a non-standard standard, nor was the representative's assessment of the quality and quality of the exported goods Samples were not available, the customs department did not receive any complaints about the quality from any foreigner. The alleged confession of the accused before the Investigation Officer regarding the imports of imported goods was inadmissible notification (Section RO) enables the accused to claim duty drop, which does not quantify the individual ratio rate. And the assessee was not told, not directly related to the purpose of determining the quantity of duty drop, no direct evidence was available regarding the proportion of components in exported goods consumed by duty malfunction. So, to say that they were not of the standard, the Investigation Agency alleged that Lzman suffered the failure to establish reasonable grounds to prove guilt. Further investigation into the crime and the matter was needed. The accused was admitted on bail in the circumstances pakistani advocates Toru lawyer