Find a Lawyer

HAFIZ MUHAMMAD ARSHAD versus STATE

Section 302 Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 7 (a) The prosecution case of the definition of evidence rests only on the evidence of the circumstances, namely, the prosecution's confession of the accused with extra-judicial confession and the recovery of a blood-stained knife. Neither of his witnesses. Earlier, the accused had confessed to his crime, either he had detained it or reported it immediately to the complainant or the police, but the next day he reported it to the police and kept the statement secret for several hours. I did not provide any explanation to keep, saying that the witnesses had no position to pressure the complainant to apologize to the accused and thus he had no opportunity to appear before them for the confession. Even otherwise, the extra-judicial confession was a very weak type of evidence that in the absence of it could not be safely relied upon. He was. Evidence of any independent evidence No witnesses from Part of H were involved in the blood recovery proceedings The stabbing knife said on the defendant's request that the blood stained knife should not be reported to the chemical examiner as well. Was sent, the suspect was detained for more than a month after the incident, he had enough time to wash the blood stains, for example the knife of the accused after such a long time. Or was it wise to abolish the same seed recovery, all the legal rituals of the judicial confession He was not brought on record after complying with the customs nor did he voluntarily qualify for the magistrate's examination before the accused family advocate from Gujrat lawyer