Find a Lawyer

UZAIR ZAKARIA versus STATE

Sections 497 Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990), Sections 33 (11) (a) (c), (13) (18), (19) and 37C Customs Act (IV of 1969), Section 156 (14) ( 77) & () 84) Guarantee, the accused's grant received an unacceptable sales tax refund and customs waiver of crores of rupees from Sales Tax (Enforcement), and Collectorate of Customs (Export) during this period from April. Until June, 2005, the goods allegedly belong to some other companies and the accused had conveniently handled filing, fabricating and forging fake documents and claiming waivers and approving refunds or waivers. No action was accepted or any action was taken against any of the officers. The collection of the money was started, as the lodging bills could be verified on the basis of which the action was taken, except for the documents filed by the accused in support of the refund and waiver claims. In addition to laying bills. It was suspected at the time that the entire trial case was a destination change, since the goods were dropped in Dubai instead of Germany, the destination change on sales tax returns apparently had no effect because the refund amount was input tax. The invoice will be determined on the basis of the amount mentioned and is irrespective of whether the goods were exported to Germany or a claim for a Dubai waiver cannot be ruled out on the basis of a change of destination. Was entered advocates from More kunda lawyer