Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN THROUGH LEGAL HEIRS versus SHER MUHAMMAD KHAN

Claiming Section 13 for pre-emptive student media and student-proof plaintiffs, due to suspicion and conspiracy jar, they claimed that whenever they had been molested and students, the sale of land under premature occupation. And they announced that they would exercise their right to a lien when a defendant testified that they knew about the sale within two months, after which they confessed. Whether one of the plaintiffs had filed against the plaintiff with details of the change of sale on the day the sale was made, His own testimony proves that he had learned about the sale some time ago, compared to the date it was stated. There was no evidence that no evidence was found on the record of the first Talib in accordance with the provisions of 8% of the Punjab Pre-Emission Act 1991, the impression of thumb on the seller on the notice. The CEO specifically denied them until the postman was given evidence only that he could not say whether it was the seller to whom the notice was given and not the plaintiff's. Failure to prove efficiency was in accordance with the provisions of the law. online advocate from Kahror Pacca lawyer