Find a Lawyer

MUSLIM COMMERCIAL BANK versus IJAZ AHMED KHAN

Appeal to unfair practice by section 49 (4) (e) and 52 employees Appeal against the employee who was appointed cashier at the bank and was "employed" by the nature of his duties, issued a show cause notice Was dismissed from the job. Holding an inquiry against him on the charge of temporary absence from duty without permission, the employee filed a complaint under section 49 (4) (e) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance 2002, alleging that it It was alleged that he has been out of employment for more than three and a half years. A member of the National Industrial Relations Commission affected by his trade union activities has accepted the request. The bank had filed an existing appeal which could not explain the delay of more than three-and-a-half years in filing the application, the accuracy employee was not entitled to equal relief and the sole member commission did not advertise the matter even otherwise. Could not support his claim by presenting any evidence on record, the employee did not utter a word about his trade union activities, which allegedly caused anger for the officers of the bank who Forced to commit unfair practice with employees, the employee's statement alone was not enough, he was found guilty I should have presented my peers to confirm my version, when the bald allegation of extraordinary labor hard work could not be allowed to keep the job, the employee would have known about his affiliation with a registered trade union. No certificate was ever presented and he could not prove it list of supreme court advocates from FR DI Khan lawyer