Find a Lawyer

JASHAN LAL versus STATE

The defendant, who could not identify a material defect in the ocular testimony, requested that the accused be sent to probation in appreciation of section 3 and 5 panel codes (XLV of 1860), section 33 7 F (i) and 34 evidence. Can be sent at the hearing of. As provided under the Probation of Offenders Ordinance, the defendants' and complainant's shops were adjacent to each other as they belonged to a business community, enmity between which they were previously accused, Had taken the law into their own hands. There was no criminal trial for the accused in a felony trial, appropriate in situations where the Probation of Undersecretary Ordinance, 1960 could be requested, the accused's crime did not include the death sentence, nor did the ordinance impose section 5 of the accused. Came under the foregoing provisions. Can be sent to secure probation under conditions, even otherwise, sending the accused to trial will help improve the suspects, because if the accused is sent to jail, the hen will be mixed with the hardened criminals and Their future can be harmed if the accused is sent to probation because the accused will not commit any such crime or other crime during the investigation and the society will feel safer under the circumstances. The accused's hands were sent to trial for a period of one year, subject to the grant of bail while his appeal was dealt with accordingly while maintaining the conviction and conviction of the accused. best law firm from Sohawa District Jelum lawyer