Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AKRAM versus MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE

Sections 10 and 24 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 25 Municipal Committee re-process the state land and sell its sale at a market price to the vendors by private contract, the committee leases its foreclosure in the possession of the applicant. Which was later. The applicant's denial of the applicant's denial of the option to sell to the applicant as such shop was not actually allotted. The valid applicants were based on a contract between the shop occupation committee and the original allottee, which was paid by the committee for the superstructure of the shop. In view of the compromise between them, the original applicant cannot change the applicant's status and cannot distinguish the case from other cases. The Committee directed the State Land Board of Revenue to collect the rent already received by the committee shop According to the note issued by the shopkeepers, the right to buy a shop in the possession of the applicants was only real. The case of the shopkeepers was similar to the case of the other sitting shopkeepers, Article 25 of the Constitution affected the proceedings, so it was separated under the circumstances. \ R \ n \ r \ n famous supreme court advocate from Kotla Arab Ali Khan lawyer