Find a Lawyer

MOHY UD DIN versus STATE

Defining the section 302 (b) evidence, the reduction in the F1R has stated that there has been a complaint and animosity between the parties for the last 5/6 years on the land and the dispute between the accused and the accused parties the day before the dispute. The address was known. There was no question of knowing each other very well; the statements of the two witnesses, as far as the cause of the shootings by the accused, were consistent and supported by medical evidence. Less than 6 miles away, the case was reported 5/2 hours after the incident, and the delay, which remained unclear, concluded that time and allegation was made that the accused's father And make a story to get a brother involved and make a story of the shootings and crosses. Evidence of the evacuation was not supported by evidence of the shooting, nor was there any firing on the wall of the suspect's home. In the event of suspicion that the D had taken self-defense by the accused or at the hands of his accomplice, the circumstances were not supported, but the complaining party did not come to the fore with the facts, I did not. Section 230 Case (B), while maintaining the conviction of the accused under PPC, reduced his sentence from death sentence to life imprisonment and the accused was also given CRPC. patent advocate from Chowk Maitla lawyer