Find a Lawyer

HOUSE BUILDING FINANCE CORPORATION THROUGH CHIEF MANAGER versus UZAIR LATIF KHAN AND OTHERS

An unfair labor practice appeal by Sections 2 (XXX), 49 (4) (E) and 52 `workers / employees, was appealed against the order passed by the Single Bench of the Commission for Rehabilitation of Appeals, under which Employee Complaint Request Accepted was that through the Administrative Circular, the employer had upgraded all Grade 7 posts as Assistant Manager without any change in the nature of the duties and the duties of the employee. Because he was performing well before his so-called promotion and so he was an employee working under the law Yin also claimed that those who held the position of superintendent retained their position as employees until after their upgrade, the employees opposed the request that the commission's jurisdiction Was affected by Section 2A of the Service Tribunals Act, 1973. With Article 1212 of the Constitution, the employer's point was that the employee claiming the status of an employee should direct positive evidence; the oral documentary film to prove that its basic and fundamental duties were manual or invaluable, but the present case. None of the five witnesses did anything to establish the status of employees, because the employee's lawyer's lawyer still reiterated that his position as an employee did not change the status of the employee. And they continue to maintain their position because the main matter involved in this matter is It was not known whether the scope of the employee and to the other Officer regarding the status of \ the labor advocate for immigration from Chicha watni lawyer