Find a Lawyer

PIR BAKHSH ALIAS PIRAN versus STATE

Section 497 Appeal Code (XLV of 1860), Section 310A Bail, Custom Black Fort Custom Custom Marriage Ritual Approval, Revenge Season h Means Bail The accused against the accused / applicant in non-bailable offense was a member of the Panchayat. Accordingly, the customary trial of the accused was granted to two women of the complainant's family, who were allegedly abducted by the complainant's brother, in connection with the custody of the accused. Was rejected. That the two women of the complainant's family were not given revenge in connection with the marriage. It was contracted by the father of the alleged kidnapper and the father of a woman whose brother allegedly kidnapped the woman. This offense was not justified under Section 31010A, PPC, whether in the light of the contents of the FIR Components of Section 101010, the PPC was prepared from its bare reading or any other material required. Can be determined only after the recording of the evidence, although in the context of the S3 in10 e AA, the revenge on PPC was not appreciated, giving PPC some compensation for the rights of the accused. Or was considered to be confessed and the rights of the detainees are always produced at the time of the commission of the crime, no FIR so the abduction allegedly sued about the commission. In the context of the FIR, the decision of a panchayat decision can be considered strictly that it may be temporarily considered such a fact to file a prosecution in exchange for compensation for the kidnapping offense. In the scope of section 1010 AA, PPC, which could only be made by evidence and in this case criminal advocate from Skardu lawyer