Find a Lawyer

HAMZO versus STATE

Section 459 Testimony of Evidence The benefit of doubt is the initial story of the event, which was neither fully supported nor corroborated by a prosecutor's witness, and is not examined by another prosecution witness. The prosecution's witnesses claimed that they had identified the accused in the moonlight, but the complainant was silent about the distance from which he saw the accused. Another witness of the prosecution testified about 6 to 7 feet. Distance was given, but medical evidence did not support his statement, error and misidentification of the accused, in the circumstances, could not be denied and the location of the incident. He was not charged by the prosecution witnesses, so in fact, the suspects' identity was also suspected from a long distance, the prosecution's case was extremely suspicious against the accused, the benefit of the doubt was given to the accused and he The charge against him was acquitted. famous high court advocate from Kasur lawyer